Iamgine a woman hooks up with a steady man with an normal to decent income?

The man had a vasectomy but doesnt inform her about it. In an attempt to get pregnant she "forgets" the pill. Since she is not getting pregnant she bangs some thug who is barely getting by financially. When she comes back pregnant to the well off guy for marriage or child support he can proove the child is not his, since his sperm count is zero a surprise to the soon to be mother.


Should the guy have to pay child support anyway, since he tricked her and because it is in the best interest of the child to go after the money of the well off guy since there is nothing to take from the biological father ?

Iamgine a woman hooks up with a steady man with an normal to decent income?
I think many here would be surprised to learn that many men have been in similar circumstances where they were ordered to pay child support for children to which they are unrelated. It is an all too common problem.


Estimates put the percentage of this at between 7-35% and many states still hold to the legislation that says all children born into the marriage are considered children of the husband. Depending on the state, he has a very narrow window in which to contest paternity. This means if she can hide it long enough, she's free and clear and will NEVER be prosecuted for fraud, even when she knows the husband is not the father.


Not only should the husband in your question not have to pay, she should be heavily fined and jailed for fraud and attempted extortion as well as receive nothing in the divorce, if the husband chooses to go that route. The bio-dad should receive total shared custody with the mother.
Reply:No. It is her responsibility, and the biological dad's, but good luck getting a penny out of him. That said, I think these two should stay together. They are both liars!!!
Reply:There is an expression in Law that requires that you "come to court with clean hands" In other words, you cannot take somebody to court to get what you claim is "your justice" if you, yourself, are guilty of a wrongdoing relating to this same issue.





However, in this particular case the "clean hands" element isn't even necessary. He did not tell her he'd had a vasectomy, but he had no obligation to do so,since they were not married. They both entered into a sexual relationship, of their own free will, knowing (at least in her case believing) that pregnancy could result. She wasn't succeeding in getting pregnant, as she wanted, so she went with another man and it worked. The man she wants to marry, or get child support from, because he is wealthy, has no obligation to pay her a dime because the child is not his and he has the proof.


The man she hoped to pin the pregnancy on did not "trick her" he just didn't tell her, and she didn't ask.. She got pregnant because she went after it with somebody else, and she is the one who tried to trick the wealthy guy into thinking the child was his. Not knowing he'd had a vasectomy, her plan backfired. She ended up getting exactly what she deserved.





A man in this situation has no obligation to a child that isn't his, and he certainly has no obligation to the woman who tried to act out a deception by pinning the pregnancy on him for personal material gain. The fact that the child is the innocent one in this "game of deception" , is regrettable, but the bottom line is who is actually responsible for that child coming into the world? Only three other people involved, and just two of them created the child. Game over.
Reply:No. Infidelity is involved. I feel for the little kid, though.
Reply:No person with an ounce of integrity would support the non-bio Dad being financially responsible for the child. Some might say we need to do what's best for the child, but imagine the repercussions if this scenario played out with any regularity. It would be quite a blow to the progress of the women's movement. Guys are already afraid of divorce, they don't need this too.
Reply:Child support is not put in place for punishment of moral dishonesty. It was put in place to support your biological child- so the answer is no.





I have seen a couple of rulings where the non-biological father has been ordered to pay child support, which in my opinion is non-sense.
Reply:no he shouldn't HAVE to. if he feels like it is something he wants to do because he cares about the welfare of this child, or possibly cares about the woman, then he should.





how long do you have to think to come up with hypotheticals like this?
Reply:I hope so, because its very likely that the thug she hooked up with is ME.
Reply:As long as he never claimed the child he shouldn't have to pay.
Reply:Nope, ya reap what ya sow so she's burned her bridge there.
Reply:So forget the fact that she goes off the birth control secretly in an attempt to get pregnant. Then cheats on the guy getting knocked up and intentionally lies about who the father is to obtain money. The man should pay because he didn't say that he had a vasectomy?





The biological father should pay the child support. The other man has no responsibility for the child, and the mother needs some sense beat into her.



tanning